This page is English Version of the Japanese article of this blog.
We achieved the rendering performance comparison of the mapping platform following the article on the storage efficiency. The data used for it are as follows.
- The coastlines in Japan which makes the GLOBAL MAP an origin
SVG:0.9MB, GeoJSON: 1.6MB, KML: 2.3MB
- The roads in Japan which makes the GLOBAL MAP an origin
SVG: 10MB, KML: 29MB
- The river lines in Australia which makes the GLOBAL MAP an origin
Among these, the data of 1 and 2 is the one having used it in the article before.
The environments used are as follows.
Everythings are operated on Pentium M 1.1GHz 768MB WindowsXP(JP).
||SVG Map Toolkit 0.6|
||Adobe SVG Viewer 3.0|
||Renesis Player 1.0|
||OpenLayers 2.6 / Internet Explorer6|
||OpenLayers 2.6 / Opera9.5|
||OpenLayers 2.6 / FireFox3.0.1|
||Google Maps / Internet Explorer6|
||Google Earth 4.3|
Performance measurement results concerning data "1" (unt:[seconds])
Performance measurement results concerning data "2"
(OpenLayers and GoogleMaps dropped out. )
Performance measurement results concerning data "3"
(KML dropped out. )
Processing speed of SVG Map Toolkit was the highest among these. It is because it is tuned by paying attention to the rendering performance of map data.